While much of the DC media had their feel-good helmets firmly affixed for the christening of the Nationals Park Sunday evening, Edge Of Sports’ Dave Zirin takes a slightly different path towards the curtain raising for “a monument of avarice that will clear the working poor out of the Southeast corner of the city as surely as if they just dispensed with the baseball and used a bulldozer.”
The Post reported on the ballpark’s grand opening with hard-hitting articles like, “Lapping Up a Major Victory, and Luxuries, at New Stadium.” Without irony, the article quoted people from the suburbs of Maryland and Virginia, about how much fun they were having playing Guitar Hero and eating authentic DC half-smokes before the big game. It should have come with coupons for the Make Your Own Teddy Bear booth, but that was nothing compared to Postsports columnist Tom Boswell, who long ago cornered the market on sloppy baseball nostalgia. The guy would sob watching home movies of Boog Powell flossing his teeth.Some Boswell from opening night included, “Imagine 25,000 people all smiling at once. Not for a few seconds, but continuously for hours. You won’t see it at a tense World Series. But when a brand new ballpark opens, especially in a city that hasn’t had such an experience for 46 years, people can’t help themselves.”
In a nod to actual journalism, Boswell did manage to raise a few questions. “Are they worth the money? Has MLB mastered civic extortion, playing one city against another?” But have no fear. He had no answers. “That’s a different story, a different day.” Unfortunately it’s a story over the last two years he has never written on any day. He did quote another suburban warrior making the trek into the big bad city who said, “Sometimes you got to spend money to make money.” Of course, not his money, but why quibble?
Boswell was a model of restraint compared to city columnist Marc Fisher. In a piece titled, I kid thee not, “The City Opens the Ballpark,And the Fans Come Up Winner,” Fisher wrote, “An investment in granite, concrete and steel buys a new retail, residential and office neighborhood. It buys the president of the United States throwing out the first ball. And it buys a son showing his father what his boy has become.” (I don’t even understand that last line. A son shows his father…his boy? So the father is a grandfather? Is this some sort of Southern Gothic goes to the ballpark? Maybe Fisher was just blissed out on $8 beers and making his own teddy bears.)
Sigh.
Yes, the park was expensive, but the reality was that it was worth it and the point of most of the articles during the opening was how “worth it” it all was.
The park required hundreds of millions of dollars of tax money to build, but a significant chunk (about $24 million per year) will be paid for using a special tax increase on certain kinds of businesses ($3 million gross sales) who were viewed as winners when the ballpark would be built.
It’s pretty much wrong to say that working poor were moved for the park. Primarily it was gay nightclubs who were the biggest losers- the cavernous loft-style clubs were centrally located and were kicked around once again. There were houses demolished, but the people were guaranteed a reasonable sale price on their homes in a market downturn (roughly $600k per home). In some cities a $600k windfall might bring someone out of the “working poor” tax bracket completely.
What was always interesting about that neighborhood was that it contained countless underutilized junk properties within a 10 minute drive of the US Capitol. Not unlike, let’s say, parts of the Lower East Side that were later gentrified. Those properties were not going to stay like that for more than a few more years before someone would get the money together to develop it all, they were never going to stay as homes, that much is as certain as a gentrified Brooklyn.
Lastly, there is no reason that the city of Washington, DC should lose out on having a stadium in favor of it going to a wealthier suburb. That is a defeatist attitude. When ya got married, ya bought your wife a ring, you didn’t wish that she married someone else so HE would buy her the ring, right? Criminy, we got a great opportunity and we took it and by all accounts we won.
“When ya got married, ya bought your wife a ring, you didn’t wish that she married someone else so HE would buy her the ring, right?”
I was gonna write something about how little you seem know about my marriage, but I’ve been getting distracted. I have to keep telling Bruce Ratner, “no, I don’t have Don’s phone number”, and how I’m pretty sure you’ve already got a job.
I think you meant Mark Ratner.
At worst you could say I’m an architectural modernist at heart, something both Populuxe and futuristic. I saw the brutalist architecture in sci-fi films as a kid- think Conquest of the Planet of the Apes- and was more bemused than most. But no one, under any circumstances, should think that I’m not a modernist when it comes to city planning.
I live in a historic neighborhood with all the pros and cons associated with same (I can’t modify the exterior of my home at all), but I don’t support all neighborhoods becoming historic because cultures and needs change. Some neighborhoods should stay as they are and others should change.
But if NYC’s Robert Moses was partially responsible for the Brooklyn Dodgers leaving…
No, I think I meant Bruce.
Because Mark Ratner, I could understand.