(Lou, managing his temper beautifully, after Ryan Dempster gave up back-to-back HR’s to the Cards this weekend.)
First, ESPN blows off coverage of the Cubs’ termination of the Cards’ pennant hopes this weekend (like that happens everyday) for meaningless Red Sox/Yankees games. Now, two weeks before the regular season’s close, Lou Piniella has come to their attention. Apparently, not only has Piniella been named Cubs manager, but his temper is under control, his team is in first, and he likes bottled water. ESPN’s Jerry Crasnick introduces Cubs fans to their new manager here. Btw, Crasnick says Lou likes to play the horses — where does that fall as far as MLB’s policies on gambling go?
“When I started managing, they’d have a bottle of vodka in the room,” Piniella said, laughing. “Now I’ll eat a piece of fruit and have a bottle of water.” Piniella, in his first season with the Cubs, will always be captive to his emotions to a degree. His temper is legendary, and he’s a product of the 1960s and ’70s, when men were men, takeout slides really hurt, and managers liked their ballplayers tough, gritty and pressure-resistant.
But Piniella is also a stock market devotee, occasional horseplayer and information junkie at heart. He adheres to the concept of baseball as a “percentage game,” and trusts in the power of numbers over the long haul. During charter flights, Piniella will don his reading glasses, pull out the statistical data at his disposal and map out lineups for the next series before the plane lands. If Cubs outfielder Cliff Floyd is 14-for-35 career against Tom Glavine, or an opposing starter’s release time enhances Alfonso Soriano‘s chances of stealing a base, Piniella feels obliged to put that in the vault. “I’ve never been on a plane ride with him where he didn’t work the whole time,” Chicago general manager Jim Hendry said. “I don’t think people give him enough credit for that.” While Piniella admits he’s mellowed since the Cincinnati days — when he grappled with Rob Dibble in the clubhouse and inspired mock base-throwing contests in the Queen City — he’ll always be perceived as Mount Lou on the verge of an eruption. An ESPN anchor took note when Piniella, looking quite displeased, lifted the ball from Ryan Dempster‘s hand after a rough outing Friday in St. Louis. But after the game, Piniella took pains to reiterate his faith in Dempster, telling reporters that his closer simply had a bad day at the office. With the season winding down and Milwaukee clinging to the Cubs like a conjoined twin, Piniella isn’t about to start trifling with Dempster’s confidence. Piniella’s challenge, as always, is finding a way to motivate his players and not overwhelm them with his hard-driving bent. “I have to guard against my competitive nature when I manage a team,” Piniella said. “I can’t be more competitive than the team. I have to find their level and hover slightly above it. If not, you’re always going to be upset.”
Yeah, Lou hardly gets any press. Neither do the Cubs or Cards or their awesome manager dude. Meaningless Red Sox/Yankees games?!? Maybe they didn’t decide the pennant, but meaningless?They don’t ask Crazy Rick Sutcliffe to do color for just any game, you know.
The Cubs fan in the office next to me named her dog Wrigley and if she has pups one “will DEFINITELY be named Lou!!!” so there must have been at least a few dozen Lou Pinella articles for her to have been able to obtain and remember this information.
What Rog said above…not to mention the fact that the Cubs/Cards are both awful baseball teams.
A clarification, which I thought was clear, I was talking about the national media.
The Sox-Yankees race is over. Are you telling me ESPN needed to cover those games because the nation is losing sleep over which one of them will be the wild card and which one will win the division? Nothing will be decided at Fenway or Yankee Stadium this month except whether the Sox “stink” or “suck.”
National coverage of the NL Central this last month has been weak, most likely because I haven’t been posting much about it to this trend-setting blog. Michael’s office mate should have been covering that Sox-Yankee game, not Sutcliffe. Let me know what she does with the puppy named Brickhouse.
Ben
Let me know what she does with the puppy named Brickhouse.
i’m gonna go out on a limb here and say she’s lettin’ it all hang out.
I always laugh hysterically when someone mentions ‘the media’ or ‘the national media’ as if it’s one guy sitting at a desk deciding everything. I consider dot-coms of the major networks and magazines to be part of the ‘national media’ (whatever that is) and I’ve seen plenty of talk regarding Sweet Lou and Mr. Genius. Benjamin, you gotta learn that you can’t make sweeping generalizations without painting yourself into a corner. And, anyway, I though that Fox was showing their version of ‘regional coverage’ because not everyone saw the Sox/Yanks game; believe there was at least one other game shown that day (*cue Ben whining about the Dodgers and D’Backs getting all of the ‘national’ attention* hahahaha).
Are you telling me ESPN needed to cover those games because the nation is losing sleep over which one of them will be the wild card and which one will win the division?
I don’t think anybody said that, Jen. I think that when you have cheating sons of bitches like Tiny Wang and Jobba the Hut trying to end Kevin Youkilis’ life on the field, then my main man Eric Hinske taking out Dumbo clean out on that play at the plate, it’s more than just a little bit entertaining. But maybe your version of entertainment is watching one mediocre team full of has-beens losing the division to another mediocre team full of wanna-bees for the NL (*yawn*) Central crown (pffft). And, anyways, as of last Friday the wildcard race in the AL East wasn’t that clear (I thought the Tigers might pop a roid or two or at least drink a LOT of coffee before the games and make the race interesting again; alas, we know this week that won’t be the case).
Not that I want to stop Rog the media expert from laughing hysterically at the naivete of a nation that doesn’t give a shit about whether Johnny Damon has a beard or not, but East Coast bias in the National Media is hardly an imaginary issue, which I know because National Media loves covering itself and discussing it. If you think ESPN’s coverage of the Sox and Yankees this weekend was their idea of regional, then why the fuck did I have to watch it out here in California? That race has tightened up since then, but it didn’t make as much as then to show it as it does now. And yeah, I should’ve been getting a Dodgers/Diamondbacks game.
Wow, I had a whole huge long rant all done and I hit the wrong key and the browser re-loaded and my wonderful argument is lost forever. Jen, I don’t have the energy to re-type that fine epic poem, so I’ll just give you the choppy, Sports Center-style highlights:
-national media attention is a reflection of ad revenues in certain markets; if the Sox/Yanks game is being shown in Alaska, it must mean that people there are actually watching it and, indeed, would prefer to watch that game over the Cards/Cubs games or else they wouldn’t show it.
-follow the money, dummy, etc.,
-was there a Midwest bias when Michael Jordan was still playing in Chicago? Cuz that’s all we ever saw on NBC during that time period, dummy.
-is there currently a West Coast bias given the disproportional media attention being given to USC football?
-dummy
-your sports writing is naive and clichéd, much like the work of Mike Celizic or Murray Chass; you rely too often on (wrongly) established ‘truths’ about sports. You’re no Seth Mnookin, that’s for goddamned sure. You are the internet version of Rick Sutcliffe except that Crazy Rick sometimes says something so weird that it’s funny in a sad way. You’re just boring.
-I can’t believe that GC has allowed you to soil the good CSTB name by letting you post. I would at least like the same opportunity to soil CSTB but I don’t kiss ass so that ain’t happening.
-I can’t wait for the next pathetic Steve Bartment chapter in the Cubs history so that I can hear the biased East Coast media talk about that mercilessly and repeatedly.
one last add:
-the fine folks at FireJoeMorgan were complainging about NOT getting the Sox/Yanks on Fox, and that they got the Dodgers/D’Backs game instead and that it sucked. Not everybody outside of the New York and Boston markets feels like you do, so stop speaking for everybody.
ben, it’s a NATIONAL telecast so most people won’t be watching their home town teams. so barring that, which teams do you think have larger fan bases? do the dodgers pull the kind of ratings that either the red sox or yankees do? I honestly don’t know the answer but my gut is telling me that they don’t. the diamondbacks were having trouble filling their stadium 4 weeks ago so i can’t imagine they draw boffo ratings.
I can’t believe Rog wrote that CSTB has a good name to soil!
Oh, guess what mandudes, I just turned on the ESPN television network and tonight, Sept. 19th they are showing…..a Yankees game…no, just kidding. They’re showing THE GODDAMNED CHICAGO CUBS V. THE CINCINNATI REDS!!! Lord have mercy, those east coast biases have struck again!!! Now, why would someone in NYC want to see a game between one of the worst teams in the nation against a team that is definitely not going to the playoffs?!? Why, I outta call the mayor of Wrigley and complain about the Midwest bias that keep me from enjoying a Sox/Blue Jays matchup. In case you can’t tell, I’m being sarcastic!!!
you see, that’s what I mean. If I start give Rog full-posting rights, he’s gonna scare off all the not-nearly-as-zealous contributors. including me!
I’m just curious why so many TV shows take place in the midwest. Bob Newhart, Mary Tyler Moore, ER, Drew Carey, etc. If a program isn’t based in New York (preferably in an apartment much bigger than the sort real people actually live in). I really don’t wanna know about it.
Goddam right ESPN is showing the Cubs/Reds game. It’s like I said, when I’m posting here, the National East Coast Media Conspiracy takes notice and acts accordingly.
And yeah, I’m as sad as everyone else that Rog hit the wrong button and we lost his ONE brilliant post and have been subjected to, instead, THREE of his usual quality entries to make up for it.
Who knows, Rog may be right that Americans really do want to watch the Red Sox disappear into the Yankee record books for the 1,000th time in a century, but Jesus, I sure don’t.
Ben
PS — KT, Rog is the one who felt the Yankees/Sox coverage this weekend was “regional” or whatever he was saying. Take it up with him.
“Mandudes?”
I thought about starting my own sports blog, but there’s too many of those around and the last thing I need is for Will Leitch to take shots at me (I wouldn’t be as ‘nice’ as GC has been, I can tell you that).
Unrelated: my fantasy team this season is #12 out of 12. Is there a SABR stat that might suggest that my understanding of the game is actually better than the other 11 blokes? Probably there is. I’m pretty sure of it.
Jen, I said the other game was regional. I’m perfectly aware that Alaskans saw the Sox/Yanks game. I think kt and myself are both trying to make you understand why they showed the superior of the two matchups in so many other cities outside of Boston and New York. It has to do with supply/demand and something about ad revenues and viewership, but you probably wouldn’t understand.