“Enough, already, with compassion for society’s middle and lower orders,” writes George F. Will in today’s Washington Post. “There currently is a sympathy deficit regarding the very rich. Or so the rich might argue because they bear the heavy burden of spending enough to keep today’s plutonomy humming.”

Envy increases while — and perhaps even faster than — wealth does. When affluence in the material economy guarantees that a large majority can take for granted things that a few generations ago were luxuries for a small minority (a nice home, nice vacations, a second home, college education, comfortable retirement), the “positional economy” becomes more important.Positional goods and services are inherently minority enjoyments. These are enjoyments — “elite” education, “exclusive” vacations or properties — available only to persons with sufficient wealth to pursue the satisfaction of “positional competition.” Time was, certain clothes, luggage, wristwatches, handbags, automobiles, etc., sufficed. But with so much money sloshing around the world, too many people can purchase them. Too many, in the sense that the value of acquiring a “positional good” is linked to the fact that all but a few people cannot acquire it.

That used to be guaranteed because supplies of many positional goods were inelastic — they were made by a small class of European craftsmen. But when they are mass-produced in developing nations, they cannot long remain such goods. When 40 percent of all Japanese — and, Fortune reports, 94.3 percent of Japanese women in their 20s — own a Louis Vuitton item, its positional value vanishes.

Whatever Facscinating stuff, I’m sure you’ll agree. And while Will fails to identify the primary cause for the uber rich being today’s middle class, that’s perfectly ok. As a baseball guy, I wouldn’t expect him to try and track down Bryant Reeves.