Who’d willingly toil for Clippers owner Donald Sterling without benefit of a signed agreement? According to the LA Times’ Lisa Dillman, none other than GM Elgin Baylor, whose more than two decades with the club came to a messy end earlier this week.
Though many of the details remain unclear, several pieces of information emerged. Sources with knowledge of the situation who were not authorized to comment publicly said that Baylor had been working without a contract since the early 1990s, having been told that one was not necessary.
Now it appears Baylor is gearing up for a battle, hiring attorney Carl Douglas and employment law specialist Alvin Pittman.
“Elgin gave 22 years of his life to the Clippers and it’s regrettable they are trying to put him out to pasture in this way,” Douglas said.
Douglas acknowledged that there “is a dispute over the circumstances of his [Baylor’s] separation” with the Clippers. They are trying to get the matter resolved informally. If that doesn’t happen, Douglas said they will “leave our options open.”
Later, at Clippers headquarters, Dunleavy noted that not much had changed. He guessed that negotiations between the Clippers and Baylor had been going on for about a month.
Donald Sterling isn’t going to let Al Davis be the biggest sleazbag owner on the West Coast. Labor issues like these fascinate me; how can such a high-profile business owner be so incredibly stupid? Actually, he’s only slightly dumber than Elgin Baylor if the latter agreed to work without anything in writing. Contract law, people, it’s really important!
I like to think Elgin has been working for the last 5 or 6 months without a paycheck. Only he didn’t notice because he gets direct deposit and just figured money was going in his account until he bought a 30 dollar slurpee one day last week due to overdrafting his account.
You can thank wells fargo for letting him know he was fired 6 months ago.
which one is rusk which one is the buttholes